Welcome to vnonline.co.uk

vnonline.co.uk provides the veterinary nursing profession with the latest news and industry developments, as well as events, resources, learning materials and careers.

Our website is dedicated to veterinary nurses and we strive to provide a platform where you can voice and explore your interests.

Not a member yet? Sign up for free!

Register for free with vnonline.co.uk to gain unlimited access to news, resources, jobs and much more!



Click here to become a member







Log in to vnonline

Forgot your password?

Posted: 14th July 2021

Zoetis found in breach of NOAH medicines promotion code
NOAH has ruled that Zoetis UK Limited has breached its Code of Practice for the Promotion of Animal Medicines.

The case involved unsubstantiated claims about CircoMax® Myco. 

The National Office of Animal Health (NOAH) has ruled that Zoetis UK Limited has breached its Code of Practice for the Promotion of Animal Medicines.

NOAH’s Code of Practice on the Promotion of Animal Medicines Committee met in June 2021 to discuss a case brought about by Hipra UK and Ireland Ltd. The case involved promotional claims made between March and May 2021 for Zoetis’ product, CircoMax® Myco.

Hipra UK and Ireland Ltd complained that Zoetis had made unsubstantiated claims that CircoMax® Myco provides the broadest protection and broader coverage against porcine circovirus (PCV2).

Among these claims included the phrases: “Stay one step ahead with the broadest, longest-lasting combined PCV2 and M.hyo* protection” and “Protect your pigs with Europe’s first and only dual PCV2 genotype vaccine. Broader coverage – against multiple PCV2 genotype and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae”.

A NOAH press release reads: ‘Following comprehensive presentations from both parties and detailed analysis of the scientific and technical background, the Committee found that in their promotional statements, Zoetis promoted its CircoMax® Myco vaccine as providing better and broader protection against the PCV2 virus than other vaccines on the market and that the evidence presented was not sufficient to substantiate such claims.'

Further details about the case are available on the NOAH website.

 




Become a member
or log in to add this story to your CPD history