Welcome to vnonline.co.uk

vnonline.co.uk provides the veterinary nursing profession with the latest news and industry developments, as well as events, resources, learning materials and careers.

Our website is dedicated to veterinary nurses and we strive to provide a platform where you can voice and explore your interests.

Not a member yet? Sign up for free!

Register for free with vnonline.co.uk to gain unlimited access to news, resources, jobs and much more!



Click here to become a member







Log in to vnonline

Forgot your password?

Posted: 7th September 2015

Captive breeding 'not the solution'
clown fish
Capture and pre-sale mortality rates are said to be 80-98 per cent in 'aquarium' fish.
Clifford Warwick calls for positive lists or outright ban
 
Biologist Clifford Warwick has criticised those who promote the captive breeding of exotic pets as a good alternative to the sale of wild-caught animals.

Writing in The Ecologist, he said that for the individual animal "the abuses inherent to being captive-bred are as bad as they are to being wild-caught".

He believes an outright ban on keeping wild animals as pets, or a 'positive list' system (where species are verified as 'safe' to sell or keep), is the only way to address the welfare and conservation issues.

The issues with wild-caught animals being supplied to the pet trade are well-known - animals are transported across the globe in crowded, unsanitary conditions, facing shockingly high mortality rates.

In 'aquarium' fish, the capture and pre-sale death rates are said to be 80-98 per cent. The 'industry standard' mortality rate for amphibians, reptiles and mammals is 70 per cent in their first six weeks at wholesalers.

The trade also has implications for wild populations, Mr Warwick argues. The rising demand for clown fish after the release of popular film Finding Nemo, resulted in a 75 per cent decline in the species.

However, Mr Warwick points to the unsuitable environments in which captive bred animals are often kept.

He also questions the conservation benefits of captive breeding, writing: "If welfare is set aside, not that it should be, but if it is, then does the evidence demonstrate unequivocal conservation and ecological benefits from artificially raising animals? From over 30 years as a wildlife trade investigator I can confidently state that it does not."

While researching his article for The Ecologist, he claims he could find no examples of captive breeding endeavours that met a list of criteria and were associated with successful conservation or reintroduction of species.

For the full article, visit: http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_analysis/2985202/captive_breeding_saving_wildlife_or_saving_the_pet_trade.html

 




Become a member
or log in to add this story to your CPD history